Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 7 de 7
Filtrar
1.
J Neurosurg Sci ; 67(4): 507-511, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34763388

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to identify independent risk factors for incidental durotomy (ID) during decompressive lumbar spine surgery, and to describe its treatment. METHODS: This retrospective review includes 650 patients who underwent lumbar decompression at a tertiary institution between January 2015 and October 2019. Data collection was obtained through one independent researcher. The incidence rate and treatment of ID was evaluated by a chart review of operative notes, patient charts, physiotherapy reports, and nursing reports. RESULTS: The incidence rate of ID was 12.6%. The most common reason for admission was disc herniation (63.2%), followed by vertebral stenosis (22.1%). ID resulted in significantly longer operation time (P=0.0001) and length of hospitalization (P=0.0001). A correlation between ID and patient's diagnosis (P=0.0078) as well as the chosen type of surgery (P=0.0404) with an Odds Ratio to cause ID of 1.9 for laminectomy and 1.6 for undercutting compared to microdiscectomy were found. However, age, sex, surgeon experience, lumbar level, revision surgery, as well as multilevel surgery were not significantly correlated with the incidence of ID. Dural tears were closed with dural sealant (47.2%), polyester 4-0 sutures (11.1%) or a combination of both (37.5%) and the majority of patients had bed rest of at least two days. By usage of these treatment methods no patient needed reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Diagnosis of vertebrostenosis as well as laminectomy were significantly correlated with the incidence of ID. Treatment with intraoperative closure and postoperative bed rest even though not standardized led to complication free outcomes.


Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Humanos , Incidência , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Descompressão , Dura-Máter/cirurgia
2.
J Neurosurg Spine ; 34(6): 821-829, 2021 Apr 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33836502

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) is among the most common pathologies affecting the spinal cord but its natural history is poorly characterized. The purpose of this study was to investigate functional outcomes in patients with DCM who were managed nonoperatively as well as the utility of quantitative clinical measures and MRI to detect deterioration. METHODS: Patients with newly diagnosed DCM or recurrent myelopathic symptoms after previous surgery who were initially managed nonoperatively were included. Retrospective chart reviews were performed to analyze clinical outcomes and anatomical MRI scans for worsening compression or increased signal change. Quantitative neurological assessments were collected prospectively, including modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score; Quick-DASH; graded redefined assessment of strength, sensation, and prehension-myelopathy version (GRASSP-M: motor, sensory, and dexterity); grip dynamometer; Berg balance scale score; gait stability ratio; and gait variability index. A deterioration of 10% was considered significant (e.g., a 2-point decrease in mJOA score). RESULTS: A total of 117 patients were included (95 newly diagnosed, 22 recurrent myelopathy), including 74 mild, 28 moderate, and 15 severe cases. Over a mean follow-up of 2.5 years, 57% (95% CI 46%-67%) of newly diagnosed patients and 73% (95% CI 50%-88%) of patients with recurrent DCM deteriorated neurologically. Deterioration was best detected with grip strength (60%), GRASSP dexterity (60%), and gait stability ratio (50%), whereas the mJOA score had low sensitivity (33%) in 50 patients. A composite score had a sensitivity of 81% and a specificity of 82%. The sensitivity of anatomical MRI was 28% (83 patients). CONCLUSIONS: DCM appears to have a poor natural history; however, prospective studies are needed for validation. Serial assessments should include mJOA score, grip strength, dexterity, balance, and gait analysis. The absence of worsening on anatomical MRI or in mJOA scores is not sufficient to determine clinical stability.

3.
Heliyon ; 7(2): e06075, 2021 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33553774

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Cardiovascular computed tomography (cardiovascular CT) is currently used as a fast non-invasive method for the visualization of coronary plaques and walls and the assessment of lumen stenosis severity. Previous studies demonstrated the high negative predictive value of CT for the exclusion of coronary lumen stenoses. In this study we hypothesize that coronary CT angiography (CTA) represents a reliable method as diagnostic procedure in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) even in emergency settings. METHODS: 36 patients (51 lesions) with ACS who underwent cardiovascular CT, intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and invasive coronary angiography (ICA) within 48 h were included. The percentage of coronary stenoses were measured and compared by three methods. Influence of available predictors that can potentially affect the measurement results was assessed. RESULTS: Cardiac CTA provided comparable results to IVUS (mean difference -0.45%, PPV: 98%, NPV: 75%). ICA tends to estimate lower stenoses degrees than cardiac CTA and IVUS (mean difference 13.19% and 13.64%, respectively). The final diagnosis and positive remodeling did not lead to any significant influence on measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The cardiovascular CT results show that even in emergency settings it is possible to identify morphological changes as sequels of coronary artery sclerosis with comparable results to the reference method IVUS. Deviations of IVUS and cardiovascular CT from ICA are comparable and can to a large extent be explained by differences in the measurement technique.

4.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(16): 1063-1069, 2021 Aug 15.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33492085

RESUMO

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional blinded-assessor cohort study. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the inter-rater reliability of the modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score in a large cohort of degenerative cervical myelopathy (DCM) patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The mJOA score is widely accepted as the primary outcome measure in DCM; it has been utilized in clinical practice guidelines and directly influences treatment recommendations, but its reliability has not been established. METHODS: A refined version of the mJOA was administered to DCM patients by two or more blinded clinicians. Inter-rater reliability was measured using intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), agreement, and mean difference for mJOA total score and subscores. Data were also analyzed with analysis of variance for differences by mJOA severity (mild: 15-17, moderate: 12-14, severe: <12), assessor, assessment order, previous surgery, age, and sex. RESULTS: One hundred fifty-four DCM patients underwent 322 mJOA assessments (183 paired assessments). ICC was 0.88 for total mJOA, 0.79 for upper extremity (UE) motor, 0.84 for lower extremity (LE) motor, 0.63 for UE sensation, and 0.78 for urinary function subscores. Paired assessments were identical across all four subscores in 25%. The mean difference in mJOA was 0.93 points between assessors, and this differed by severity (mild: 0.68, moderate: 1.24, severe: 0.87, P = 0.001). Differences of ≥ 2 points occurred in 19%. Disagreement between mild and moderate severity occurred in 12% of patients. Other variables did not demonstrate significant relationships with mJOA scores. CONCLUSION: The inter-rater reliability of total mJOA and its subscores is good, except for UE sensory function (moderate). However, the vast majority of assessments differed between observers, indicating that this measure should be interpreted carefully, particularly when near the threshold between severity categories, or when a patient is reassessed for deterioration. Further efforts to educate clinicians on administration and to refine the UE sensory subscore may enhance the reliability of this tool.Level of Evidence: 1.


Assuntos
Ortopedia , Doenças da Medula Espinal , Vértebras Cervicais/cirurgia , Estudos de Coortes , Estudos Transversais , Humanos , Japão/epidemiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Doenças da Medula Espinal/diagnóstico , Doenças da Medula Espinal/cirurgia
5.
J Clin Med ; 9(3)2020 Mar 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32164395

RESUMO

It is challenging to discriminate the early presentation of Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) as well as sensitively and accurately distinguishing between mild, moderate, and severe levels of impairment. As gait dysfunction is one of the cardinal symptoms of DCM, we hypothesized that spatiotemporal gait parameters, including the enhanced gait variability index (eGVI), could be used to sensitively discriminate between different severities of DCM. A total of 153 patients recently diagnosed with DCM were recruited and stratified on the basis of DCM severity grades, as measured using the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association (mJOA) scale. Demographic information and neurological status were collected. Gait assessments were performed using an 8 m walkway. Spearman rank correlation was used to identify relationships between gait parameters and mJOA values as well as the mJOA lower extremity (LE) subscore. Kruskal-Wallis H test was performed to evaluate differences between severity groups, as defined by mJOA classification. A significant and relatively strong correlation was found between the mJOA score and eGVI, as well as between the LE subscore of the mJOA and eGVI. Significant differences in the eGVI (X2(2, N = 153) = 55.04, p < 0.0001, ε2 = 0.36) were found between all groups of DCM severity, with a significant increase in the eGVI as DCM progressed from mild to moderate. The eGVI was the most discriminative gait parameter, which facilitated objective differentiation between varying severities of DCM. Quantitative gait assessments show promise as an accurate and objective tool to diagnose and classify DCM, as well as to potentially evaluate the impact of therapeutic interventions.

6.
Eur Spine J ; 27(10): 2449-2456, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30056597

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The preoperative prediction of medical complications is essential to optimize perioperative management. SpineSage™ is a free of charge online calculator to predict medical complications in spine surgery. The current study utilizes it in patients undergoing spine surgery to assess whether the predicted risks would correlate with the actual complication rate in clinical practice. METHODS: A total of 273 consecutive patients who underwent spinal surgery were assessed. The risk of medical complications was predicted for each patient, and all medical complications were recorded within 30 days of surgery. Based on their predicted risk of complication, patients were divided into three risk groups (< 15, 15-30, > 30%). RESULTS: The predicted overall risk of medical complications was 14.7% and was comparable to the observed complication rate of 16.1%. The predicted risk for major medical complications (3.8%) was also similar to the observed complication rate (3.3%). Detailed analysis of the segmented risk groups suggests a close correlation between predicted and actual complication rates. Receiver operating characteristic analysis revealed an area under the curve of 0.71 (p < 0.001) for the prediction of overall medical complications and 0.85 (p < 0.001) for major complications. CONCLUSIONS: The online risk calculator predicted both overall and major medical complications. The tool can assist in preoperative planning and counseling of patients. These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary Material.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Ortopédicos/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Sistemas On-Line , Prognóstico , Curva ROC , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Adulto Jovem
7.
J Magn Reson Imaging ; 26(4): 886-93, 2007 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17896363

RESUMO

PURPOSE: To apply and to evaluate the newly developed advanced fast marching algorithm (aFM) in vivo by reconstructing the human visual pathway, which is characterized by areas of extensive fiber crossing and branching, i.e., the optic chiasm and the lateral geniculate nucleus (LGN). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Diffusion tensor images were acquired in 10 healthy volunteers. Due to the proximity to bony structures and air-filled spaces of the optic chiasm, a high sensitivity encoding (SENSE) reduction factor was applied to reduce image distortions in this area. To reconstruct the visual system, three different seed areas were chosen separately. The results obtained by the aFM tracking algorithm were compared and validated with known anatomy. RESULTS: The visual system could be reconstructed reproducibly in all subjects and the reconstructed fiber pathways are in good agreement with known anatomy. CONCLUSION: The present work shows that the advanced aFM, which is especially designed for overcoming tracking limitations within areas of extensive fiber crossing, handles the fiber crossing and branching within the optic chiasm and the LGN correctly, thus allowing the reconstruction of the entire human visual fiber pathway, from the intraorbital segment of the optic nerves to the visual cortex.


Assuntos
Corpos Geniculados/anatomia & histologia , Quiasma Óptico/anatomia & histologia , Nervo Óptico/patologia , Visão Ocular , Vias Visuais , Adulto , Algoritmos , Difusão , Feminino , Corpos Geniculados/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Modelos Anatômicos , Quiasma Óptico/patologia , Nervo Óptico/anatomia & histologia , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Retina/anatomia & histologia , Sensibilidade e Especificidade
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...